| Author |
Message |
admin
Site Admin

Joined: 09 Mar 2008 Posts: 776
Location: In my garage |
|
Umm not quite sure why ???????? |
|
?????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????
Is that bumper conected to the shell I can't quite see ?????????????
_________________ Sponsored By Demon Products - Schumacher UK - Titanium Racing
Numb Nuts Tri Club 2007 / 2008 Pro Stock Champion 2008 / 2009 Numb nuts open Champion , 2008 CMCRC Brushless Champion , 2008 CMCRC Open Champion , Ansmann GP Stock Vice Champion 2009
. |
|
| Mon Sep 29, 2008 3:55 pm |
|
 |
Greyfox
Racer

Joined: 09 Mar 2008 Posts: 266
|
|
|
|
Looks like it has been cut down into a U shape only - must admit I can't see why they would want to do it other than to try to save a bit of weight.
_________________ Beauty is in the eye of the beer holder! |
|
| Wed Oct 01, 2008 7:44 am |
|
 |
Trigati

Joined: 18 Mar 2008 Posts: 30
Location: Ipswich, UK |
|
|
|
I guess that in a crash the normal bumper would compress but then till transfer the impact straight to the chassis.
In this case, after the flex of the shell there are little V pieces of what is probably lexan (like little springs) which then absorb a little more before transferring the impact onto the bumber. With the u shape I guess the bumper would not only compress but also the prongs would bend absorbing more impact prior to transfer to the chassis.
So unless the ipact was a pole, right in between the prongs, which may just be able to impart all the impact to the chassis if you're luck was zero, I would suggest that it's probably more efficient.
|
|
| Fri Oct 03, 2008 10:19 am |
|
 |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
|
|